User talk:Timtrent

Click here to leave a new message, LINK to any article you want me to look at And sign your posts using ~~~~. I may not bother with posts where articles are not linked and posts are not signed. I may just delete them and ignore them and you. I do not review drafts on request, nor, normally, do I review a draft more than once, so please do not ask If you want me to do something for you, make it easy for me, please.

This is the home account for Fiddle Faddle, which is both my nickname and my alternate account. When you begin a new message section here, I will respond to it here. When I leave message on your Talk page, I will watch your page for your response. This maintains discussion threads and continuity. See Help:Talk page#How to keep a two-way conversation readable. If you want to use {{Talkback}} or {{ping}} to alert me about messages elsewhere, please feel free to do so.

It is 8:28 PM where this user lives. If it's the middle of the night or during the working day they may well not be online. For accurate time please the page

I do not remove personal attacks directed at me from this page. If you spot any, please do not remove them, even if vile, as they speak more against the attacker than against me.

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

In the event that what you seek is not here then it is archived (0.9 probability). While you are welcome to potter through the archives the meaning of life is not there.

Draft:Robert_W._Amler

Hi @Timtrent

I added information to the article based on the information requested. Would you be able to take a look? Draft:Robert W. Amler

Jrodriguezrentas (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

@Jrodriguezrentas I am mystified. I said I looked at it. I have seen that it has been rejected and thus will not proceed further. You may query this with the reviewer who rejected it. and you appear to have misunderstood that as encouragement to edit it further. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Maratha Confederacy

Thank you for calling our attention to the edit-warring report. I thought briefly of closing the DRN case, which is what is done if there is also a dispute at WP:ANI, but then I realized that sometimes at WP:ANEW the edit-warriors may be told to request mediation at DRN. So I will just wait and see what happens next, either another post by an involved editor, or an uninvolved admin action. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon I feel in my water that the ANEW report was filed maliciously as part of the dispute. I do not see much good faith exhibited by those in dispute. I think your approach to be sound, though DRN is an area I have never become involved in. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

The other editors have not replied, even though you told one of them that it would be polite to advise the DRN people whether they were going to participate. Now I will close the DRN report as ignored. Somebody may get blocked unless they go off and edit in other articles. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon Not that you need my agreement, but I agree. They are none of them well behaved, I think. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Help to make my article better

Hello Fiddle,

Thank you so much for giving comments on my article. I was kindly requesting you to help me edit my article Draft: Nicholas Omonuk as I have received 3 past declines and I have always made edits but I dont know exactly which areas I go wrong. Could you assist me in this area. Clare Nassanga (talk) 23:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Nicholas Omonuk is the article Clare Nassanga (talk) 23:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

@Clare Nassanga I will assist, but not in the way you expect. I will teach you to fish rather than give you some fish.

The article needs rewriting. The existing text is the wrong place to start.

Please start by reading this essay and pay special attention to the process. Start with references.Do not wrote a single word until you have looked at the references. Do they show that he passes WP:BIO? if they do, yhen create a storyboard from what you select from them to say. Then, using 100% of your own words, write the article.

If they do not show he passes, abandon the project until he does things that others write about with significant coverage in multi independent secondary sources and then write the article 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Sock

User:ChineseDognut is just another sock puppet of User:Tochi Clement, seeing the Johnel page history. The subject has prevented been vandalising the article. A checkuser tool should prove this! 102.89.23.163 (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

See here. A new user User:ChineseDognut, out of the blue, nominating an article he previously vandalising for speedy deletion. 102.89.23.223 (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

I am sure you are correct 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheChineseGroundnut where you may wish to comment. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Will do. Thank you for understanding. Also, if you go to the sock puppet investigation page of User:Tochi Clement you'll also notice that this is the exact same claim User:ChineseDognut makes of the article. 102.89.23.223 (talk) 16:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

I have suggested that the two investigations be linked, as you will see. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

How am I a sockpuppet, I have edited only on one draft Draft:Muyeez, I've spent days learning about wikipedia policy and how to make new articles. I'm not the one that banned TheChineseGroundnut, I was editing Muyeez draft and learning from everywhere I could, then I found out that TheChineseGroundnut has been banned and Adambenji is a sockpuppet to the user and Johnel was created by Adambenji, review and approved by the same person TheChineseGroundnut. I'm only doing what every wikipedia editor would do. 中国人 狗坚果 (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Because you've used several scope like this (starting a total different topic to cover up and use it as a point to defend yourself) and later on, get caught. A checkuser will look Into it and most definitely, you would be blocked. It's so obvious that you're another sock! 102.89.23.215 (talk) 16:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

You're only angry because a newbie on wikipedia caught your act and reported you. 中国人 狗坚果 (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Either you are or you are not. That is what the investigation will determine. Me? I don't care either way. I think you are, so I started the investigation. Others will judge. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

---

Enough, now. This discussion is not relevant here. Discuss it, or not, at the sockpuppet investigation, not here 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)