User talk:Drmargi

30 Sept/1 Oct 3RR warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

May 2024

Drmargi, please stop this madness. Universal Cable was Universal Content Productions all along on Mr Robot. 148.252.158.60 (talk) 22:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

That’s not the issue, and you know it. You’ve been reverted by multiple editors because you are adding incorrectly formatted information to the infobox. That has to stop. Drmargi (talk) 00:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Well it's already too late because you're blocked for a month. Much to that actually it is time that you finally reliaze that the other IP user who added info was corrected formatted information. 148.252.159.156 (talk) 23:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

This from someone who’s been IP hopping to evade your own block. It doesn’t alter the fact that you keep pushing an erroneous edit, and over multiple pages. Drmargi (talk) 02:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for repeated violations of the three-revert rule and the edit warring policy, as you did at Mr. Robot. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Drmargi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OK, I took a time out to step away from this issue and disconnect from the edit war. I know better where edit wars are concerned, but let myself be frustrated by an IP hopper forcing in an edit that several editors had already reverted and told him was incorrectly constructed. I've got other things that matter more here to work on, and will do so without further edit warring. The delay in requesting an unblock was a deliberate choice to give me time to "get over it" and find other places I'm interested in devoting my time. Drmargi (talk) 01:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=OK, I took a time out to step away from this issue and disconnect from the edit war. I know better where edit wars are concerned, but let myself be frustrated by an IP hopper forcing in an edit that several editors had already reverted and told him was incorrectly constructed. I've got other things that matter more here to work on, and will do so without further edit warring. The delay in requesting an unblock was a deliberate choice to give me time to "get over it" and find other places I'm interested in devoting my time. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=OK, I took a time out to step away from this issue and disconnect from the edit war. I know better where edit wars are concerned, but let myself be frustrated by an IP hopper forcing in an edit that several editors had already reverted and told him was incorrectly constructed. I've got other things that matter more here to work on, and will do so without further edit warring. The delay in requesting an unblock was a deliberate choice to give me time to "get over it" and find other places I'm interested in devoting my time. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=OK, I took a time out to step away from this issue and disconnect from the edit war. I know better where edit wars are concerned, but let myself be frustrated by an IP hopper forcing in an edit that several editors had already reverted and told him was incorrectly constructed. I've got other things that matter more here to work on, and will do so without further edit warring. The delay in requesting an unblock was a deliberate choice to give me time to "get over it" and find other places I'm interested in devoting my time. [[User:Drmargi|Drmargi]] ([[User talk:Drmargi#top|talk]]) 01:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Ouch, this is your seventh block for edit warring. I see a lot of merit in your unblock request and I see you have an incredibly long and constructive edit history. But, youch, your seventh block for edit warring? I'd support an unblock if you commit to WP:1RR. I want to be clear, other reviewing admins may well find your above unblock request compelling without any further restrictions (and if so, reviewing admin, please act!). My goal here is simply to ensure there is never an eighth block for edit warring here. If you, Drmargi, have another idea on how to ensure that, please let me know! --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

I concur with Yamla that a 1RR restriction is a good idea; I also don't mind another admin acting. 331dot (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)