Talk:Tiger Man (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

The song is notable. I have more sources commented out in the "References" section. But now I think it would be advisable for me to switch tasks, so I'll leave this page as it is for some time, okay? --Moscow Connection (talk) 17:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I still dispute that it's notable. The only one of all of those sources which is reliable and says anything more than the passing mention "Elvis covered it in the 1968 concert" is the Counting Down Elvis book. Richard3120 (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1. Elvis Presley version
1. [1]. This book discusses the song in detail.
2. [2] This one discusses Elvis' version shortly.
The original
1. [3] This one says the 1953 original was a success.
2. [4]Billboard says the song was "memorable", so it must have been.
I think I can write a couple paragraphs based on this. Actually, I wanted to nominate the article for DYK, but I thought there were more sources than these four. --Moscow Connection (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Richard3120: When I was writing this, I found a Billboard review → [5].
    I think I may still nominate this article for DYK, but not now. Right now I should better do other things, like completing my earlier DYK nomination and creating some simpler articles. Maybe I should return to this article in a month or so. --Moscow Connection (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • And I remember seeing some critic criticizing the song. It was something along the lines that it was banal and forgettable. (Not these words exactly, but something like this.) It's strange that I don't see the statement anywhere in the sources I commented out in the "References" section.. Maybe I saved the link to that book in some other folder on my computer. --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't include the first source in your list. Richard3120 (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was already here → [6]. --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]