Talk:Ladette to Lady

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Last Name[edit]

Can anybody find the surname of April. I have tried looking but can't seem to find it. I wonder if anyone else could have more luck? Eagle Owl 22:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Eagle Owl[reply]

Series 4[edit]

I've labelled series 4 as "Series Four (aka Aussie Ladette to Lady)" linking to the article for the Aussie show, because that's what it is. The word Aussie was dropped for UK broadcast, but it is indeed the same series. So is Series 4 even correct, or do we restart from series 1 again? Also, the Aussie article contains spoilers for UK viewers, should details from that article be duplicated in this one? Digifiend (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American ladettes[edit]

I do not like the season where there are American ladettes to become ladies. It carries too much the character of a reality show, and it is not at Eggleston Hall anymore. Moreover, I do not know what the new teacher is doing there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wacz016 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's the show The Girls of Hedsor Hall. Possibly, it could be mentioned as a spin-off in this article. V85 (talk) 13:06, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV issues[edit]

Parts of this article seem to share the POV of the programme, valuing 'ladylike' behaviour over 'laddette-like' behaviour. I will try to adjust it. E.G. the gloss given for laddette is judgemental: ""i.e. loud, foul-mouthed and uncultured young women, who like to drink and smoke and who are often sexually promiscuous", and "look like real ladies." (compare Real Scotsman)

I also think too much space may have been given to the plot details of the series, and it would be good to get some more criticism of the series in. It looks like this may be a good critique, but people might not consider it a sufficently reliable or notable source. ((current version) sorsoup (talk) 23:30, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ladette to Lady. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329144324/http://www.barb.co.uk/viewingsummary/weekreports.cfm?report=weeklyterrestrial&requesttimeout=500 to http://www.barb.co.uk/viewingsummary/weekreports.cfm?report=weeklyterrestrial&requesttimeout=500

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]