Talk:International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 days |
The article Generation Z and the Israel–Hamas war was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 May 2024 with a consensus to merge the content into International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}. |
The contents of the Transatlantic Civil Servants' Statement on Gaza page were merged into International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war on 27 April 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Visitors to Israel during the 2023 Israel–Hamas war was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 January 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
List of serving heads of state and government that have visited Israel during the 2023 Israel–Hamas War was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 November 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 23 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to International reactions to the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Instance of conflicting phrasing in Evacuations of foreign nationals section[edit]
In the section on evacuations of foreign nationals there is a line:
On 12 October, the United Kingdom arranged flights for its citizens in Israel; the first plane departed Ben-Gurion Airport that day. The government had said before that it would not be evacuating its nationals due to available commercial flights. However, the flights were commercial.
This phrasing seems confusing, and perhaps it is too concise. The BBC article it cites [1] says:
The UK government said earlier this week it would not arrange evacuation flights because commercial routes were still available. But British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, EasyJet, Ryanair, Wizz Air, Air France, Lufthansa and Emirates have all suspended flights in recent days. ... The government-arranged flights will be chartered by the Foreign Office but are commercial services. Each passenger will be charged £300.
I suggest that the following replace this line:
On 12 October, the United Kingdom arranged flights for its citizens in Israel; the first plane departed Ben-Gurion Airport that day. The government had previously said that because commercial flights out of Israel were still available, it would not arrange evacuation flights for its nationals. However, once most commercial airlines began suspending flights out of the country, the British Foreign Office arranged chartered flights using commercial services.
Blackjackrobo (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Robert de Niro hoax[edit]
Posting this news report so that no user can pretend that they were not warned that Robert de Niro's "pro-Israel" video was a hoax.
Borgenland (talk) 11:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 May 2024[edit]
It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |
Canada stopped its arms sales to Israel. [2] Josep a11 (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 May 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under international reactions, South Africa, the last line states that the ICJ ordered that Israel stop its offensive completely. However, that is incomplete and incorrect. The ICJ, in May 2024, ruled 13-2 that Israel must cease any operation which may cause destruction to Palestinian life, in part or in full. The subtle difference may be subtle, but it's a difference nonetheless.
Source: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240524-pre-01-00-en.pdf 152.110.127.91 (talk) 12:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done. Most RS are reporting it in that fashion. See South Africa's genocide case against Israel. Selfstudier (talk) 12:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- List-Class International relations articles
- Unknown-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- List-Class Israel-related articles
- High-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- List-Class Palestine-related articles
- High-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests